Assessment Policy

How assessment, academic integrity and academic appeals work on CHE courses

Version

3.0

Effective Date

September 2026

Review Date

September 2027

Policy Owner

Head of Academic Operations

1. Purpose

1.1 This policy sets out how the Centre for Homeopathic Education (“CHE”, “we” and “us”) assesses students, protects academic standards and handles academic appeals. It applies to all students and should be read with the Student Agreement and the Trainee Handbook.

2. Assessment And Progression

2.1 Each course has its own published assessments. The Trainee Handbook, the assessment directive for each assessment and your cohort’s assessment calendar set out what you must complete, how it is marked and when it is due.

2.2 Academic progression is based on successfully achieving the published programme assessments and requirements at Levels 4, 5 and 6.

2.3 On the practitioner programme, you must also complete the Clinical Training, supervision and practice-readiness requirements before practitioner readiness is confirmed.

2.4 The Progression Assessment Board meets in July each year and decides progression, including where extenuating circumstances apply under the Attendance Policy.

3. Academic Integrity

3.1 You must:

  • submit your own work;
  • acknowledge your sources accurately;
  • follow the requirements in each assessment directive;
  • follow exactly any instruction that permits or restricts digital or AI tools, and make any declaration the directive requires; and
  • ask before you submit if you are unsure whether support or a tool is permitted, rather than making an assumption.

4. Academic Misconduct

4.1 Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism, paying someone else to contribute to your work, or helping someone else to engage in academic misconduct.

4.2 The penalty depends on how serious the offence is. It can range from resubmitting a piece of work to removal from the course, with an administrative fee of up to £150 where applicable.

4.3 Allegations are handled under the disciplinary procedure in Schedule 1 of the Student Agreement.

5. Academic Appeals

5.1 An academic appeal asks CHE to review whether an assessment process was carried out fairly and in accordance with CHE procedure. It is not a route to challenge academic judgement simply because you disagree with a grade.

5.2 Appeals follow four stages:

Stage
What happens
Lead / decision point
Indicative timeline

1. Informal discussion

2. Formal appeal

3. Formal review

4. Final adjudication

Raise the concern and clarify the process.

Submit the appeal form and supporting evidence.

Appeal evidence is reviewed against CHE policy and the assessment record.

A final decision is made and communicated in writing.

Academy Programme Lead

Student

Head of Academic Operations

Academic Board

Within 7 days

Within 14 days of result notification

Normally within 7 days

Normally within 7 days

5.3 Email formal appeals to [email protected], marked for the attention of the Head of Academic Operations. Your appeal should identify the procedural concern, provide relevant evidence and explain which CHE process or requirement you believe was not followed.

6. Appeals And Complaints

6.1 A complaint concerns a service, administration, communication, conduct or another aspect of your experience. It is separate from an academic appeal and is handled under our Complaints Policy.

7. Deferrals

7.1 If serious circumstances outside your control stop you submitting work or sitting an assessment on time, please use the Assessment Deferral Policy.

8. Support

8.1 CHE provides one-to-one learning support. To arrange a session, or to tell us about a learning disability or support need, email [email protected]. Reasonable adjustments are covered in our Equal Opportunities Policy.

9. Records

9.1 We keep appeal files for 6 years after the appeal is closed, in line with our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Questions about this policy: [email protected] · 020 3405 4580